"The only way to be truly satisfied, is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do." Steve Jobs
Once "inking" gets into your veins you will never be able to live without it. Frank J. Garcia

My Surface PRO 3 'Must Have' Accessories List

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

What do you prefer for your mobile Internet solution, a shrunken PC or a non-PC?

That's the main question Daniel Gentleman asks readers in a very good article where he explains the differences between UMPCs and MIDs. Even when the title of his article could sound more like a Windows-Linux debate,  it's more between what works better for you in your everyday Internet Mobile needs, a shrunk PC or a non-PC.  Here is a comparison from Daniel's article that you can use to find what is better for you.

Now we have two potential mobile Internet solutions: Shrink a PC down to where it is mobile yet still usable (a UMPC) or build a non-PC device from the ground up (a MID or Internet Tablet) specifically for mobile Internet use.
Shrinking a PC

  • Advantages

    • Familiar interface

    • Vast commercial software base (supported by the software developers)

    • Vast expansion options and greater likelihood that your device will have compatible drivers

  • Disadvantages

    • Cost of PC class hardware

    • Cost of commercial operating system license

    • Constant compromises in either speed, size, or battery life. 

Building a mobile Internet device

  • Advantages

    • All hardware, software, and user interaction built to go together

    • Cheaper hardware and no operating system licensing costs

    • Wide community-based software and support

  • Disadvantages

    • Limitations in function

    • Learning curve for new interface and software

    • Often not as user-friendly as full PCs (either in interface or in application support)

Editor's Note: For me the answer is only one: a UMPC. I need more than Internet even in my daily job as news editor of this and other pages. I need to be able to manipulate pictures, run tools like Windows Live Writer, Frontpage, etc. For me to have a few "ported" applications is not enough if I can have virtually millions of them free or commercial. In my case going with Linux would be like going back to Windows CE. The reason why I bought my first UMPC was because the Pocket PC Platform was not powerful enough to cover all my needs. So... why go back to that same situation but with a different OS, in this case Linux which practically does not have any support.

[Discuss This Topic]